Saturday, 24 October 2015

My presentations semester 1

To  evaluate  my  presentation. Click  here

paper 1 :  The  Renaissance  Literature
Topic   :  Analysis  of  the  poem  Death  Be  Not  Proud


Analysis of the poem Death Be Not Proud from krishnagujarati31

To  evaluate  my  presentation. Click  here



Paper  2 : The  Neo classical  literature
Topic     : Themes  of the  novel  Tom  Jones

To  evaluate  my  presentation. Click  here



Themes in the novel Tom Jones from krishnagujarati31

To  evaluate  my  presentation. Click  here


Paper  3 : Literary  theory  and  Criticism
Topic    :  Plot  as  a  soul  of  tragedy


To  evaluate  my  presentation. Click  here




Gandhi as a epic




 Name: Gujarati Krishna V
Roll no.: 20
Paper name:-4: Indian writing in English-pre Independence:
Topic name: Gandhi as a epic
Submitted to:-  Heenaba zala
                  Department of English
                M.K. Bhavnagar University
    ‘KANTHAPURA’ - GANDHIAN EPIC

                                            
         Raja Rao belongs to a very old south Indian family of Brahmin. He was born in 1909 in the village of Hussana, in Mysore. His father was a professor of commerce in Hyderabad. He has completed his matriculated from Hyderabad, and then he went over to Aligarh for higher Education. He took his B.A. Degree from Nizam College Hyderabad. He got scholarship from Hyderabad University and then he went to France to continue his study of French Literature there.The first Novel written in Bengali was ‘ Alaler Gharer Dulal’ which is come out in 1858. However the real beginnings  with the work of the great Bankim Chandra Chatterjee. His first novel publish in English “Rajmohan’s Wife’ . It was followed next year by ‘ Durgeshnandini’ in Bengali. His other novels are:

(1) Kapalkundala
(2) Vishavriksha
(3) Krishnakantar Uyil
(4) Anandamath
(5) Dexi chaudhurani
          In the meantime Raj Lakshmi Devi’s ‘the Hindu wife’ was published in 1876 . Toru Dutt’s ‘Bianca’ in 1878.There novels, written in English have for us today no more than an antiquarian or historical interest.
This is beginning of the novel form. Mulk Raj Anand, R. K. Narayan, and Raja Rao, there are great novelist in India writing in English.

                                      Creative works of Raja  Rao

(1) Kanthapura                                                    
(2) Cow of the Barricades and other Stories       
(3) The Serpent and the rope                               
(4) The cat and Shakespeare                                
(5)  Comrade Kirillow                                          
(6)  The policeman and the Rose                          
(7)  The Chess master and his moves                   
(8)  On the Ganga Ghat                                        


‘KANTHAPURA’ - novel - Gandhian Epic: Raja rao’s Kanthapura is best cited to illustrate this purpose. The novel recodes the Gandhian impact on atypical Indian village through an informal but very intimate narration of an elderly widow, Acchakka.  Gandhi is again portrayed here as Rama, Krishna, and Shiva whose birth has a divine significance. As the novel says, once Valmiki,the great sage and the writer of Ramayana, in the novel goes to the Lord Brahma and says:

“O Brahma, you who have sent us the Prince propagators
Of the Holy Law and sages that smote the darkness of
Ignorance, you have forgotten us so long that men have
Come from across the seas and the oceans to trample on
Our wisdom and spit on virtue itself….. O Brahma, deign to
Send us one of your gods so that he may incarnate on
Earth and bring back light and plenty to your enslaved
Daughter. O’ sage…siva himself will forthwith go and
Incarnate on the earth and free my beloved daughter from
Her enforced slavery.”

         Kanthapura is Rao’s first major Indian novel in English. It is published in 1938. The novel deals with civil disobedience movement. The title of the novel is adopted by village Kanthapura. The title is apt and suitable for the novel is about a south Indian village named ‘KANTHAPURA’. The story is narrated in flashback by ‘Achakka’.

Village’s Cotemporary condition:
(1) Social Background: Raja Rao’s first novel Kanthapura is the story of a village in south Indian named kanthapura .Kanthpura is a traditional caste ridden Indian village. There are four Dominant castes like……..

          (1) Brahmin      
(3) Potter
(3) Weaver
(4) Pariah

(2) Religion Background:The village has a people who have strong rigid and orthodox background of religious. The Brahmin is upper cast of society.In the Kanthapura people are ignorant, poor and superstitious, but they are also deeply religious. They were faith in Goodness ‘Kenchamma’. She is in the centre of the village. Marriage, sickness, death, ploughing, harvesting, arrest, release all are watched by Kenchamma. There may be small pox or influence around but you make vow to the Goodness, the next morning, you walked and you find the fever has left you. There is a also temple of Kanthapurishwari.  


(3) Background Political:  In ‘Kanthapura’ – novel political ideas also be found, Earlier, British ruled over India and then slowly and steadily education got reformation and Gandhian ideas started to apply by Moorthy.The main character of the novel Moorthy is a Brahmin who discovered a half buried ‘linga’ from the village and installed it. A temple is built there, which later became the centre point of the village life. All ceremonies and festivals are celebrated within the temple premises.Hari-Kathas, a traditional form of storytelling, was practiced in the village. Hari-Kathas are stories of Hari(God). One Hari-Katha man, Jayaramachar, narrated a Hari Katha based on Gandhi and his ideals. The narrator was arrested because of the political propaganda instilled in the story.

         The novel begins its course of action when Moorthy leaves for the city where he got familiar with Gandhian philosophy through pamphlets and other literatures. He followed Gandhi in letter and spirit. He wore home spun khaddar. Discarded foreign clothes and fought against untouchability. This turned the village priest, a Brahmin, against him who complained to the swami who was a supporter of foreign government and Moorthy was ex-communicated.  Heartbroken to hear it, his mother Narasamma passed away.Bade Khan was a police officer, a non hindu of Kanthapura. He was brought and supported by the coffee planters who were Englishmen. Considered as an outsider, Bade khan is an enemy of the people who refuses to provide shelter to him.

ÆMoorthy is a character in Raja Rao's novel Kanthapura, which records the influence of Gandhian ideals on a remote South Indian village during the years of the Indian independence movement. Though it is a story of Gandhiji's charismatic effect on the village, the Mahatma does not appear in the novel. His spokesman is his disciple Moorthy who follows his master by fasting and preaching against the caste system. Like a thousand of young men all over the country Moorthy gave up his studies and joined freedom movement. He dedicated his life to the country after he followed the principal of Gandhiji. He burnet his foreign clothes and started using Khadi. He did not marry and devoted his life totally to the struggle for independence. He sacrifices his personal life and happiness for the sake of freedom fighters in the village Kanthapura.Gandhiji. He was arrested by police many times and during his trial, he behaved like a true Gandhian.There is also other character like Advocate Shankar, Rangamma and Ratna who were also followers of Gandhian ideology.

Æ Shankar is a great follower of Gandhian ideas. He is honest and upright man. He did not take any false cases a d if he knew his client had tried lie to him and was guilty, he gave up case immediately. He lived simple life and refused to go to the marriage or any party where people were not dressed in Khadi. The character of Shankar is reflection of Gandhiji.

Æ  Rangamma actively participated in the work of congress. Her house becomes the office of congress in the Kanthapura. The freedom fighter used to assemble at her house to discuss their plan of action.

Æ  Ratna was also followers of Gandhian ideas. She was widow and only 15 years old. She becomes the leader of the freedom fighters in the Kanthapura in absence of Moorthy.

         So, above characters and Moorthy also represent Gandhian ideas and follows them, though Gandhi is not present throughout whole novel, but his ideas are presented in characters. There were also many other people in Kanthapura like, Rachna, Range, Govda etc…..who also followers of Gandhiji.

-          Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes.
- Gandhiji…

By this time the Satyanarayan Puja was organized and most of people of Kanthapura had joined the Gandhian movement. So, throughout novel we can see the influence of Gandhiji on the character s of Kanthapura village. Throughout the novel Moorthy acted as a local Gandhiji and followed Gandhian Philosophy were we can compare Moorthy and Gandhiji.
           
            The novel has a Gandhian ideology and freedom struggle. The story of Satyagrahi’s moved forward steadily till it reached to its climax. It was a story of people of a small village who realized that they never new to rise and fight for freedom of their motherland.  They made effort in their direction and they fail. They left Kanthapura and settled in Kashipura as a result of the final clash between freedom fighters and the solider. Many people died and many people injured. Then whole village was set on fire and destroyed. Many people arrested. The remaining people left the village and never came back.



Conclusion: It is remarkable to not that culmination of Kanthapura has an element of doubt while shifting from Gandhis to Nehruism and it is here that sane critics raise question and it is on the integrity of Rao as a Gandhian thought doth Gandhi and Nehru have the same destination, there is difference in his ‘barrowing and difference’, Gandhi is abit nostalgic and principle unscientific and so unwelcomed. Right from the beginning a reader feels orthodox village, the great village, the great is completely transformed Moorthy, the motivation is complete and experience a sort of nationalism. Transformation continues ; Moothy continues to develop, though he does not get support from all quarters and imperialism seems to be crumbling. Achakka’s thinking and behavior reflects her understanding of the dynamic between the village and the Indian nation as the blending of tradition and modeninty. Kanthapura undergoes the process and the process is an internal one. Achakka is a perpetuator of Hindu revivalist propaganda and Rao stands as aHindu reformers to encourage self exploration.             
                                                     











    





What is criticism & terms of criticism?





Name: Gujarati Krishna V

Roll no.: 20

Paper name:-3: Literary Theory  & criticism:

 western -1:

Topic name: What is criticism & terms of  

   criticism?

    Submitted to: Dilipsir Barad

                   Department of English

               M.k. University, Bhavnagar





Q. What is criticism & terms of criticism?
Introduction:

               “Criticism is the branch of study concerned with defining,
classifying, expounding and evaluating works of literature.”
        ‘To criticize’,  etymological, means ‘to analyze’, and latter ‘To judge’.Critical should be distinguished from criticism since it concepts rather than works.it is a philosophical activity which should underlie criticism but, again should not be regarded as part of it ‘Extrinsic criticism’ has been used for that criticism which relies heavily  on information drawn from outside the literary work, and is contrasted with an ‘nitric criticism’ which does not.
The distinction of ends, which marks off various kinds of meta criticism, may be matched by a broad distinction of means: objective or subject meta criticism can obviously attain objectivity more easily than criticism but has to be based on the latter.
                                      Various types of Criticism
There are many types of criticism like……..
(1) Pragmatic Criticism
(2) ExpressiveCriticism
(3) ObjectiveCriticism
(4) Mimetic Criticism
(5) Practical Criticism
(6) Impressionistic Criticism
(7) Applied Criticism
(8) Deus Ex Machine
(9) Plot
(10)Character
(11) Diction
(12) Thought
(13) Song/melody
(14) Spectacle
(15) Tragedy
(16) Three Unities
(17) Tragic Hero
(18) Hamartia
(19) Catharsis
Lets us discuss one by one……
(1) Pragmatic Criticism: Pragmatic criticism is concerned first leading, with ethical impact any literary  text has upon an audience. It believe that dat. The works as something which is constructed in order to achieved certain effects on the audience. Effect such as aesthetic pleasure, instruction, or special feelings.
Plato provided a foundantial and absolute argument for pragmatic criticism. Pragmatic  criticism itself can be an effective means of interpretation or repression practical criticism is perhaps most dangerous when knowledge of certain “moral” literature replaces or supplants.  The need for virtuous  action.Despite the fact that pragmatic criticism originated in the Roman times, Philip Sidney, a Renaissance critic, is one of its most influential theorists.
  For example:
Sidney, poetry has a clear cut purpose to audience. Good poets are those who write. Both to delight and teach, or in other words, for delightful instruction.
(2) Expressive Criticism: Previously “Expressive” is a German movement in painting but rather on, it extended its access to other literary arts too. Expressive criticism treats a literary work primarily in relation to the author. It defined poetry as an expression, or overflow, or utterance of feelings recollected in tranquility is taken as the ground idea of the expressive theory of art.
            The three key concepts associated with this movement are……
(1) Imagination
(2) Genius
(3) Emotion
For example:
William Wordsworth preface to the second edition of lyrical Ballads is a major expression of the spirit of English Romanticism.
(3) Objective Criticism: Objective criticism approachesthe work as something which stands free from poet, audience, and the environment world. It describes the literary products a self enough object or as aanalysisan as difficulty, coherence integrity and the interrelation of its part element.
For example:
This is the characteristic approach of a number of important critic. Since the 1920, including the new critic and the Chicago school of criticism.
(4) Mimetic Criticism: ‘Mimetic’ is derived from the Greek word ‘ Imitation: ‘mimetic’ means creative copy. Mimetic criticism views the literary work as an imitation, or reflection, or representation of the world and human life and the primary criterion applied to a work is that of the “truth” of its representation to the subjects it represents, or should represents.
For example:
This mode of criticism, which first appeared in Plato and Aristotle is characteristic of modern theories of literary realism. Greek mimetic school is based upon the ideas expressed by Plato and Aristotle.
Plato regards the artist as an imitator of imitations’. The painters work is thrice removed from the “essential nature” of a thing. The artist imitates the physical object, which is a faint copy of ideas of the thing. The school, also imitates the external word but the imitation is of father poets like Greek & ancient poets, & on purpose. For the poets of this school. Purpose is more important than imitation.
(5) Practical & Applied Criticism:Practical criticism or Applied criticism concerns itself with the discussion of particular works and writers; in an Applied critique the theoretical principles controlling the mode of the analysis, interpretation, and evolution are often left implicit, or brought in only as the occasion demands.
 For example:
Among the more influential work of applied criticism in England and America are the literary essay of Dryden in the Restoration.
(6) Impressionistic Criticism:Impressionistic criticism means personal Impression. Impressionistic criticism attempts to represent in words the felt qualities of a particular work, and to express the attitude and feeling responses, the impression, that the work directly evoke from the critic.
For example:
On William Ha3lit put it in his essay “on Genius and common sense”. “You decide from feeling and not from reason; that is, from the impression of a number of thing on the mind”
(7) Three Unities: Action, Time and Place:
(1)The unity of action: a play should have one single plot or action to sustain the interest of the spectators and it can also lead him to proper purgation.
(2) The unity of time: the action in a play should not exceed the single revolution of the sun.
(3) The unity of place: a play should cover a single physical space and should not attempt to compress geography, nor should the stage represent more than one place.

(8)Deus Ex Machina: The term deus ex machina refers to the circumstance where an implausible concept or a divine character is introduced into a storyline for the purpose of resolving its conflict and procuring an interesting outcome.

The use of deus ex machina is discouraged for the reason that the presence of it within a plot is viewed as a sign of an ill-structured plot. The explanation that the critics provide for bearing the above stated view is that the writer’s sudden resort to random, insupportable and unbelievable twists for the purpose of procuring an ending highlights the inherent deficiencies of the plot. Hence, deus ex machina is a rather debatable and often criticized form of literary device.
The term is Latin for “god out of the machine” and has its origins in ancient Greek theatre. It denotes scenes in which a crane (machine) was used to lower actors or statues playing a god or gods (deus) onto the stage to set things right, usually near the end of the play.

(9) Plot:A plot is an account of the ACTION and all of the motivations lying behind the action in a literary work. A plot may include such elements as the "exposition," where the SETTING is established, the CHARACTERS are introduced, and background information is provided; the "CONFLICT"; the "climax," where the action comes to its moment of greatest tension; and the "denouement," where the action finally resolves. The Masterplots series of reference books lists plot summaries for many classic literary works; check it out!
(10) Song/ Melody:The definition of a melody is a sequence of pleasing sounds that make up a particular musical phrase.An example of melody is the most memorable arrangement of sounds in a musical composition.

1.     A pleasing succession or arrangement of sounds.
2.     Musical quality: the melody of verse.
3.     Music
a. A rhythmically organized sequence of single tones so related to one another as to make up a particular phrase or idea.
b. Structure with respect to the arrangement of single notes in succession.
c. The leading part or the air in a composition with accompaniment.

(11)Diction:Dictioncan be defined as style of speaking or writing determined by the choice of words by a speakeror a writer.

Diction or choice of words separates good writing from bad writing. It depends on a number of factors. Firstly, the word has to be right and accurate. Secondly, words should be appropriate to the context in which they are used. Lastly, the choice of words should be such that the listener or readers understand easily. Besides, proper diction or proper choice of words is important to get the message across. On the contrary, the wrong choice of words can easily divert listeners or readers which results in misinterpretation of the message intended to be conveyed.
Example:Keats in his “Ode to the Grecian Urn” uses formal diction to achieve a certain effect. He goes:
“Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard
Are sweeter: therefore, ye soft pipes, play on”
Notice the use of formal “ye” instead of informal “you”. The formality here is due to the respect the urn inspires in Keats. In the same poem he says:
“Ah, happy, happy boughs!that cannot shed
Your leaves, nor ever bid the spring adieu.”

It is more formal to use “adieu” than to say “goodbye”.

Example

In sharp contrast to Keats, John Donne uses colloquialism in his poem “The Sun Rising”:
“Busy old fool, unruly Sun,
Why dost thou thus,
Through windows, and through curtains, call on us?
Must to thy motions lovers’ seasons run?
Saucy 
pedantic wretch,”
Treating the sun as a real human being, the poet speaks to the sun in an informal way using colloquial expressions. He rebukes the sun because the sun has appeared to spoil the good time he is having with his beloved. Further, he orders the “saucy pedantic sun” to go away.

(12) Tragedy: Tragedy is kind of drama that presents a serious subject matter about human suffering and corresponding terrible events in a dignified manner.

Aristotle defines Tragedy in his famous work “Poetics” as:
“Tragedy is an imitation of an action that is admirable, complete (composed of an introduction, a middle part and an ending), and possesses magnitude; in language made pleasurable, each of its species separated in different parts; performed by actors, not through narration; effecting through pity and fear the purification of such emotions.”
From the above definition, we can understand the objective of the Greek tragedies i.e. “…purification of such emotions” also called “catharsis”. Catharsis is a release of emotional tension, as after an overwhelming experience, that restores or refreshes the spirit.

Tragedy Examples

Below is the list of famous English tragedy writers along with their famous works.

A. Christopher Marlowe:

Marlowe was the first English dramatist worthy of the tradition of Greek tragedy. His characters of tragedies are the great men of history who become victims of their own fate.
Conclusion:Criticism means ‘To criticize’, ‘TO analysis’  and latter to judge’. There are many types of criticism like pragmatic, practical , mimetic & many more. No critic can ever from accurate judge men unless the possesses the Artistic vision.





The Salient characteristics of the sentiment comedy in eighteenth century.



Name: Gujarati Krishna V
Roll no.: 20
Paper name:-2: The Neo-classical literature:
Topic name:  The Salient characteristics of the sentiment comedy in eighteenth century.

Submitted to:-  Heenaba zala
Department of English
M.k. University, Bhavnagar


                            















Q. The Salient characteristics of the sentiment comedy of the eighteenth century.                                                              Introduction:-

Ans.   A reaction against the ‘comedy of manners’ which had been in vogue during the Restoration period. The sentimental comedy A reaction against all that the comedy of manners sought to espouse .Laughter and Humors  were completely drive out. Pathos and pathetic situations were introduced .in Greek it means passion, or suffering, or deep feeling.(pathos means)The first thing that we notice in the sentiment comedy is- the complete absence of the true spirit of comedy. Sentiment means much more emotion.
Anti-sentimental comedy. Anti-Sentimental Comedy
          Anti-Sentimental comedy is reaction against sentimental comedy . The comedy of humor which goldsmith and Sheridan cultivate in eighteen century was the reaction against the sentimental comedy of clibber, Steele, Kelly. Goldsmith opposed sentimental comedy because it place of laughter and humors.

Characteristic of Anti-sentimental comedy:
(1) Wit
(2) Laughter
(3) Force
(4) Irony
(5) Disguise
(6) Also called comedy of manners

         Generally the Anti-Sentimental comedy deals with the , and it is always focus on major character as lover. And it is divided into subplot like the dramatic way and the relations with the pathos.So, let’s discuss the Anti-Sentimental comedy with its characteristics  .So here it is Anti-Sentimental comedy.


(1)                        The Rival
(2)                        The school for scandal
(3)                        She stoops to  conquer




The school for scandal

          Lady Sneerwell, who in her youth was the target of slander, has set her life upon a course to reduce the reputations of other women to the level of her own. Aided by her intimate, Snake, she intrigues to involve the Teazles in scandal, to bring Joseph Surface’s true character to light, to wreck the love between Charles and Maria, and to gain Charles for herself along with Sir Oliver’s fortune. To her the world consists of nothing but scandal and scandalous intrigues, and she does her best to make her vision a reality. She is not successful, however, when she abuses Charles Surface to Sir Peter Teazle’s ward Maria, who refuses to listen to her. Instead, Maria trustingly confides in Lady Candour, whose defense of a reputation ensures its complete annihilation.
Sometimes Sir Peter Teazle ponders the wisdom of his marriage to Lady Teazle, doubting the judgment of an old bachelor in marrying a young wife. Lady Teazle is a country-bred girl who is enjoying London life extravagantly and to the full. Sir Oliver Surface is concerned about his two nephews, his problem being the disposal of his great fortune. Sir Oliver has been abroad for the past fifteen years and feels that he does not know his nephews’ real natures; he hopes by some stratagem to catch them unawares and thus be able to test their characters. 

One day, Sir Peter and Lady Teazle quarrel because Sir Peter violently objects to her attendance at the home of Lady Sneerwell. Lady Teazle accuses Sir Peter of wishing to deprive her of all freedom and reminds him that he has promised to go to Lady Sneerwell’s with her. He retorts that he will do so for only one reason, to look after his own character. When they arrive, Lady Sneerwell’s rooms are full of people uttering libelous remarks about their enemies and saying even worse things about their friends. Sir Peter escapes as soon as possible.
When the rest of Lady Sneerwell’s guests retire to the card room, leaving Maria and Joseph alone, Joseph once more presses his suit. He insinuates that Maria is in love with Charles and is thus running counter to Sir Peter’s wishes. Lady Teazle walks in just as Joseph is on his knees avowing his honest love. Surprised, Lady Teazle tells Maria that she is wanted in the next room. After Maria leaves, Lady Teazle asks Joseph for an explanation of what she has seen, and he tells her that he was pleading with Maria not to tell Sir Peter of his tender concern for Lady Teazle. 

Sir Oliver consults Rowley, Sir Peter’s shrewd and observing servant, in an attempt to learn more about his nephews’ characters. Rowley himself believes that Joseph does not have as good a character as his reputation seems to indicate and that Charles has a better one. Sir Oliver also consults Sir Peter, who declares that he is ready to stake his life on Joseph’s honor. He is much put out, therefore, when Maria once more refuses to marry Joseph.
Sir Peter, Sir Oliver, and Rowley plan to test the worthiness of the nephews. Charles is, as usual, in dire need of money, and Sir Oliver arranges to accompany a moneylender who is going to see Charles; Sir Oliver will claim to be Mr. Premium, a man who can supply the money that Charles needs. When they arrive at Charles’s lodging, a drinking party is in progress, and some of the guests are playing games of dice. Sir Oliver is not at all impressed with Trip, Charles’s footman, who gives himself the airs of a fashionable man-about-town.
Upon investigating, Sir Oliver discovers that Charles has, with the exception only of the portraits of his ancestors, turned all of his inherited possessions into cash. Convinced that Charles is a scamp, Sir Oliver, still calling himself Premium, agrees to buy the paintings, and he purchases each picture as presented except his own portrait, which Charles will not sell for any amount of money. Sir Oliver is pleased by this fact and on that ground discounts Charles’s reputation for extravagance. Charles receives a draft for eight hundred pounds for the portraits and immediately sends one hundred pounds to Mr. Stanley, a poor relation whose financial circumstances are even worse than his own. 
During an assignation between Joseph Surface and Lady Teazle in Joseph’s library, Joseph advises her to give her husband grounds for jealousy rather than to suffer his jealousy without cause. He argues that to save her reputation she must ruin it and that he is the man best able to help her. Lady Teazle considers such a doctrine very odd.
While they are talking, Sir Peter arrives unexpectedly, and Lady Teazle hides behind the screen that Joseph orders placed against the window. Joseph then pretends to be reading when Sir Peter walks in. Sir Peter has called to inform Joseph of his suspicions that Lady Teazle is having an affair with Charles; Sir Peter also shows Joseph two deeds he has brought with him, one settling eight hundred pounds a year on Lady Teazle for her independent use, the other giving her the bulk of his fortune at his death. Joseph’s dissimulation before Sir Peter and Sir Peter’s generosity to her are not lost on Lady Teazle. When Sir Peter begins to discuss Joseph’s desire to wed Maria, Lady Teazle realizes that Joseph has been deceiving her.
Below stairs, Charles inopportunely demands entrance to the house to see his brother. Not wishing to see Charles, Sir Peter asks Joseph where he can hide. Sir Peter catches a glimpse of a petticoat behind the screen, but Joseph assures him that the woman behind the screen is only a French milliner who plagues him. Sir Peter hides in a closet, and Lady Teazle remains in her hiding place behind the screen.
When Charles comes in, he and Joseph discuss Lady Teazle and Sir Peter’s suspicion that Charles is her lover. Charles mentions that he believes Joseph to be her favorite and recounts all the little incidents that lead him to think so. Embarrassed by this turn in the conversation, Joseph interrupts to say that Sir Peter is within hearing. Placed in a difficult position, Charles explains to Sir Peter that he has merely been playing a joke on Joseph. Sir Peter knows a good joke on Joseph, too, he says: Joseph is having an affair with a milliner. Charles decides that he wants to have a look at the milliner and pulls down the screen, revealing Lady Teazle. Joseph is undone because Lady Teazle refuses to agree with any of the excuses he makes. She angrily informs her husband of the whole nature of Joseph’s intentions and departs. Sir Peter follows her, leaving Joseph to his own conscience.
Sir Oliver, masquerading as Mr. Stanley and badly in need of assistance, gains admittance to Joseph’s apartment. Joseph refuses to help Mr. Stanley, saying that he receives very little money from Sir Oliver and claiming that he has advanced all his funds to Charles. After Sir Oliver leaves, Rowley, who is a party to the whole scheme, comes to tell Joseph that Sir Oliver has arrived in town.
Sir Oliver goes again to see Joseph. Still believing that his uncle is Mr. Stanley, Joseph is showing him out just as Charles enters. Charles, surprised to see the man he knows as Mr. Premium in his brother’s apartment, also insists that he leave, but at that moment Sir Peter Teazle arrives and addresses Sir Oliver by his right name. Both Sir Oliver and Sir sPeter are now aware of Joseph’s real character. Charles, promising to try to reform, gets Maria and his uncle’s inheritance as well. Lady Sneerwell is exposed by Snake, who is paid double to speak the truth, and Lady Teazle returns her diploma to the School for Scandal, of which Lady Sneerwell is president. Everyone is happy except Lady Sneerwell and Joseph Surface. 
Rivals: Anti-Sentimental Comedy
           Undoubtedly Sheridan's purpose in writing "The Rivals" was to entertain the audience by making them laugh and not by making them shed tears. "The Rivals" was written as a comedy pure and simple. Though there are certainly a few sentimental scenes in this play yet they are regarded as a parody of sentimentality. The scenes between Faulkland and Julia are satire on the sentimental comedy which was in fashion in those days and against which Sheridan revolted.
          A brief examination of these sentimental scenes would clearly reveal that Sheridan's intention was to poke fun at the sentimental comedy of the time. We find both Faulkland and Julia absurd. The true character of Faulkland is indicated to us by Absolute's description of him as the "most teasing, captious, incorrigible lover". Faulkland's own description of his state of mind about his beloved Julia also makes him appear absurd. He says that every hour is an occasion for him to feel alarmed on Julia's account. If it rains, he feels afraid lest some shower should have chilled her. If the wind is sharp, he feels afraid lest a rude blast should adversely affect her health. The heat of the noon and the dews of the evening may endanger her health. All this is funny and certainly no to be taken seriously. Sheridan is here ridiculing the excessive solicitude and concern which an over-sentimental lover like Faulkland experiences when separated from his beloved. Sheridan seems to be pleading for mental equilibrium even in the case of an ardent lover.
       Sheridan continues to portray Faulkland in the same satirical manner. When Acres appears and is questioned by Absolute regarding Julia's activities in the countryside, Acres replied that Julia has been enjoying herself thoroughly and been having a gay time. Now, a normal lover would feel extremely happy to learn this. We expect the same reaction from Faulkland because he had assured Absolute that he would feel happy "beyond measure" if he were certain that Julia was hale and hearty. But his actual reaction is quite different and greatly amuses us by its absurdity.
      In both his interviews with Julia, Faulkland betrays the same absurdity. In the first interview, he complains to her of the mirth and gaiety that she as been enjoying during his absence. He wants to be loved for his own sake and for no particular reason and he also expects her love to be "fixed and ardent". In short, his whole manner of talking to her and his soliloquy at the end of this scene reveals him in a still more comic light.The second interview again shows him a ridiculous light. He subjects Julia to a test in order to convince himself of the sincerity of her love. The author's intention is to show the absurd length to which an over-sentimental lover can go, and the author expects us to laugh at this kind of lover.
       Even Julia suffers from an excessive sentimentality and she too is made to appear absurd and ridiculous for that reason. The manner in which she describes her lover to Lydia shows the kind of mentality that she has. In the two interviews with Faulkland, Julia is again over-flowing with emotion. We smile at the way she behaves; we are amused by her excess of emotion; we mock at the abject surrender to her lover and her repeated attempts to make up with him.Lydia too is an over-sentimental girl though in a different way; and she too becomes the subject of ridicule in the play. Her romantic ideas and her romantic planning appear absurd to us. She wants not the usual routine marriage but a runaway marriage. Now all this makes us laugh at her superficiality and silliness. These absurd notions have been derived by her from the sentimental and romantic stories to which she is addicted. The collapse of her romantic hopes disappoints her greatly but amuses us a good deal.The manner in which the other characters have been portrayed is also evidence of the anti-sentimental character of the play. Captain Absolute is a practical man and though he assumes the name and status of Ensign Beverley, he would not like to forfeit the rich dowry which Lydia will bring him. Mrs. Malaprop is a conventional, practical woman whose attitude to marriage is business-like. Sir Anthony to is a practical, worldly man. Bob Acres is a country boor with no romantic or sentimental pretensions but towards the end of the play he shows that he is more practical than anybody else by saying:"If I can't get a wife without fighting for her, by any valour, I'll live a bachelor."Then there is Sir Lucius who is absurd but not because of nay sentimentality. One reason why he is absurd is because of his insistence on fighting duels. But he does not want to fight duels for the sake f any sentiment. When Sheridan himself fought a couple of duels for the sake of Miss Elizabeth Linley, there was a strong emotion behind them, but here we have a mockery of dueling and we are made to laugh at the manner in which these duels are arranged.
Conclusion: Anti-Sentimental comedy this forms is becomes popular with the comedies that were presented by oliver goldsmith ‘s she stoops to conquer and Richard  Brinsley sheridan’s  The Rival and school for scandal it is kind of comedy representing complex and sophisticated  code of behavior  current in fashionable circle of society.